Retailer Accessibility Ratings: Which Big Stores Actually Work With a Screen Reader

In short

Online shopping should be the great equalizer for blind people, but retail websites are the worst of any industry for accessibility — and they break hardest at checkout, after all your effort is spent. This guide rates ten major retailers on what actually works with a screen reader, what breaks, and the workarounds that get your order through, with every claim verified in October 2026. Two honest caveats: Macy’s and Costco couldn’t be verified, and where evidence was thin the guide says so.

Shopping online is supposed to be the great equalizer for blind and low-vision people. No aisles to navigate, no shelves out of reach, no waiting for a sighted helper. But most retail websites are built for eyes first and screen readers as an afterthought — and the damage is worst exactly where it hurts most: the final steps of checkout, after all the effort is spent. This guide rates ten major retailers on what actually works, what breaks, and the workarounds that get your order through. Every claim below was verified against live sources in October 2026. Where evidence was thin, we say so plainly.

Why this matters: the final-checkout trap

The signature complaint of blind online shoppers is that a site can work fine through browsing, searching, and loading the cart — and then fail at the very last step. The checkout submit button can’t be activated with a screen reader, the payment form’s fields aren’t labeled, or the delivery scheduling widget is a wall of unlabeled controls. You discover the site is unusable only after all the effort is spent.

This is not a corner-case problem. AudioEye’s 2025 Digital Accessibility Index scanned 85,966 pages across 2,543 retail websites and found retail had the worst accessibility of any industry it measured:

The legal system has noticed. More than 5,000 digital-accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025, and roughly 70 percent of them targeted online stores, according to UsableNet’s filing data reported by accessibility trackers (seen October 2026). The most famous case remains Robles v. Domino’s: a blind man, Guillermo Robles, could not order a pizza with his screen reader on Domino’s website or app, sued, and courts ruled the ADA covers websites and apps — a ruling the Supreme Court declined to disturb. Blind developers discussing the case on Hacker News describe the familiar pattern: everything works until the final submit step, where an inaccessible control stops the order cold.

These numbers are why a guide like this exists. A store with 350 barriers per page doesn’t have to mean 350 barriers in your checkout — some retailers have done the work, and some haven’t. Here is what we found.

How to read these ratings

Evidence comes from blind-user reports (AppleVis forums, r/Blind discussions), the American Foundation for the Blind’s AccessWorld shopping guides, academic research, and the retailers’ own published accessibility pages — all seen in October 2026. Individual experiences vary by device, screen reader, and how recently an app updated. App versions matter: several retailers have a habit of breaking accessibility in one update and fixing it in the next.

Amazon

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Low-vision note: an independent accessibility audit found Amazon handles browser zoom poorly — at 200% zoom there are horizontal and vertical scrollbars, and at 400% the site is described as borderline unusable. If you magnify, the app’s larger text settings may serve you better than the website.

Workarounds

Walmart

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

Target

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

Macy’s

Unverified as of October 2026

We could not find current, independent reports from blind shoppers about Macy’s website or app — no AppleVis threads, no r/Blind discussions, no recent accessibility reviews surfaced in our October 2026 search. So we are not rating it.

What the company claims

Workarounds

Best Buy

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

Costco

Unverified as of October 2026

The only detailed blind-user account we found is from 2021, and it is not encouraging — but it is old, so we are not issuing a rating on it.

What we found

Workarounds

eBay

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

DoorDash

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

Uber Eats

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

Instacart

Works with caveats

What works

What breaks

Workarounds

How to read clothing listings blind

Clothing is the hardest category to buy blind, and the research backs that up. A 2023 academic study of visually impaired online clothes shoppers (arXiv 2305.11559, by researchers at the University of Sheffield) found that most retailers rely on images to present clothing features and often provide no alternative text — leaving blind shoppers unable to determine colour, pattern, graphics, or fit from the listing alone. Here is how experienced blind shoppers work around that:

Low-vision note: zoom into product photos and look for fabric texture and pattern scale. If the site’s zoom is broken (see the Amazon note above), product photos viewed in a separate image viewer or on the retailer’s app may enlarge better than the webpage.

A note on customer review photos

For sighted shoppers, customer review photos are the most trusted content on a product page — they show how the item looks in a real home, not a studio. For blind shoppers, they are almost entirely wasted. Wayfair’s own accessibility research team investigated this and found that the typical alt text on review images is non-descriptive wording like “customer image” or “summary of review” — which tells a screen-reader user nothing about what the photo shows (Wayfair tech blog, “Bringing Review Content to Life for Blind and Low Vision Consumers”).

This matters because review photos often contain the most honest visual information about a product: true colour, real-world size, how it wears over time. Wayfair’s team concluded that product-page photos are at least backed up by written specifications, but review imagery is user-generated and varies wildly — and its descriptions are the thinnest. Their project to generate real descriptions of review images is ongoing.

What to do about it: treat review text as your source of truth and review photos as bonus content you can unlock with a visual interpreter (Be My Eyes, Aira) or an AI describer pointed at the image. If a review says “see photo for the true colour,” that photo is doing work the text isn’t — get eyes on it before you buy.

Workarounds that work anywhere

When a retailer’s site or app fights you, these options don’t depend on any single store:

What we could not verify

Honesty is the policy here, so here is what we could not confirm as of October 2026:

Sources

All sources below were seen live in October 2026.